Change Identity

Overview

Change identity is a fundamental concept in Atomic that distinguishes it from Git and other version control systems. In Atomic, changes are identified by their content alone, not by metadata like author, timestamp, or parent commits.

What is Change Identity?

A change in Atomic is a set of patch hunks that describe transformations to files. The identity of a change is determined by cryptographically hashing only the patch content—the actual code modifications.

Change {
    hunks: Vec<Hunk>,        // The actual code changes
    dependencies: Vec<Hash>, // What this change depends on
}

// Change hash = hash(hunks + dependencies)
// NOT hash(hunks + author + timestamp + message + parent)

Git vs Atomic: A Critical Difference

Git Commits

In Git, commit identity includes everything:

Git Commit Hash = hash(
    tree,           // File snapshots
    parent,         // Previous commit
    author,         // Who wrote it
    committer,      // Who committed it
    timestamp,      // When it was committed
    message,        // Commit message
)

Result: The same code change gets different hashes in different contexts.

Atomic Changes

In Atomic, change identity includes only content:

Atomic Change Hash = hash(
    hunks,          // The actual code changes
    dependencies,   // What it depends on
)

Result: The same code change gets the same hash everywhere.

Why This Matters

1. No Lost Work from Duplicate Fixes

Git Problem:

# Developer A fixes bug
git commit -m "Fix null pointer bug"  # Commit: abc123

# Developer B independently fixes same bug
git commit -m "Fix null pointer bug"  # Commit: def456

# Different hashes, Git treats as different commits
# Merge creates conflict even though patches are identical

Atomic Solution:

# Developer A fixes bug
atomic record -m "Fix null pointer bug"  # Change: XYZ789

# Developer B independently fixes same bug
atomic record -m "Fix null pointer bug"  # Change: XYZ789 (same hash!)

# Atomic detects: "This change already exists"
# No duplicate work, no conflicts

2. Change References Never Break

Git Problem:

# Create PR referencing commit
PR #123: "See commit abc123 for implementation"

# Someone rebases the branch
git rebase main  # Commit abc123 becomes def456

# Reference is now broken! abc123 doesn't exist anymore

Atomic Solution:

# Create discussion referencing change
Discussion: "See change XYZ789 for implementation"

# Someone updates the change
atomic unrecord XYZ789
atomic record -m "Updated implementation"  # New change: XYZ789'

# Original XYZ789 still exists in change store
# Reference still valid, can view both versions

3. Cross-Repository Deduplication

Git Problem:

# Repository A
git commit -m "Add feature"  # Commit: aaa111

# Repository B (fork)
git cherry-pick aaa111  # Creates new commit: bbb222

# Same code, different hashes
# No way to know they're the same change

Atomic Solution:

# Repository A
atomic record -m "Add feature"  # Change: CCC333

# Repository B (fork)
atomic pull CCC333  # Same change, same hash: CCC333

# Atomic knows these are identical
# Automatic deduplication

How Change Hashing Works

Step 1: Normalize Hunks

fn normalize_hunk(hunk: &Hunk) -> Vec<u8> {
    // Extract only the content changes
    let mut data = Vec::new();
    
    // File path
    data.extend(hunk.file_path.as_bytes());
    
    // Line numbers
    data.extend(&hunk.start_line.to_le_bytes());
    data.extend(&hunk.end_line.to_le_bytes());
    
    // Operation (add/delete/modify)
    data.push(hunk.operation as u8);
    
    // Content
    data.extend(hunk.content.as_bytes());
    
    data
}

Step 2: Hash Dependencies

fn hash_change(hunks: &[Hunk], dependencies: &[Hash]) -> Hash {
    let mut hasher = Blake3::new();
    
    // Hash all hunks
    for hunk in hunks {
        let normalized = normalize_hunk(hunk);
        hasher.update(&normalized);
    }
    
    // Hash dependencies (sorted for consistency)
    let mut deps_sorted = dependencies.to_vec();
    deps_sorted.sort();
    for dep in deps_sorted {
        hasher.update(dep.as_bytes());
    }
    
    Hash::from(hasher.finalize())
}

Step 3: Base32 Encoding

// Hash is 256-bit Blake3 digest
// Encoded as base32 for human readability
let hash = hash_change(&hunks, &dependencies);
let base32 = hash.to_base32();  // Example: "XYZ789ABC123DEF456..."

Change Identity in Practice

Same Change, Different Messages

# Developer A
atomic record src/fix.rs -m "Fix bug"
# Output: Change ABC123

# Developer B (independently)
atomic record src/fix.rs -m "Fixed the null pointer issue"
# Output: Change ABC123 (same hash!)

# Atomic: "This change already exists with different message"
# Uses existing change, no duplicate

Same Change, Different Authors

# Alice commits change
atomic record src/feature.rs -m "New feature"
# Change: DEF456, Author: alice@example.com

# Bob makes identical change
atomic record src/feature.rs -m "New feature"
# Change: DEF456 (same hash!), Author: bob@example.com

# Atomic detects duplicate, suggests using existing change

Same Change, Different Timestamps

# Create change today
atomic record src/code.rs -m "Implementation"
# Change: GHI789, Date: 2025-01-01

# Create identical change tomorrow
atomic record src/code.rs -m "Implementation"
# Change: GHI789 (same hash!), Date: 2025-01-02

# Same hash despite different dates

Change Metadata vs Identity

While identity is content-only, changes still carry metadata:

pub struct ChangeHeader {
    pub hash: Hash,              // Identity (content-based)
    pub message: String,         // NOT part of identity
    pub authors: Vec<Author>,    // NOT part of identity
    pub timestamp: DateTime,     // NOT part of identity
    pub dependencies: Vec<Hash>, // Part of identity
}

Key Point: Metadata can differ, but identity stays the same.

Benefits of Content-Based Identity

✅ Deduplication Across Repositories

When two repositories independently create the same fix:

Git: Two commits, potential merge conflict
Atomic: One change, automatic deduplication

✅ Stable References

Links to changes never break:

Git: Commit hashes change with rebase
Atomic: Change hashes are stable

✅ Provable Correctness

Mathematical properties:

Same input → Same output (deterministic)
Content equality → Identity equality (content-addressed)
Commutative merges (order-independent)

✅ Cross-Team Collaboration

Teams can share changes knowing:

Same hash = exact same code change
Dependencies are explicit
No hidden context required

Comparison Table

Aspect	Git Commits	Atomic Changes
Hash Includes	Tree, parent, author, date, message	Hunks, dependencies only
Stability	Changes on rebase/amend	Immutable
Deduplication	Manual (requires coordination)	Automatic
References	Break on rewrite	Always valid
Identity	Context-dependent	Content-dependent
Merge Detection	By commit hash	By change hash

Common Questions

Q: What if I want to update a change?

A: Create a new change. The old change remains in the store.

atomic unrecord ABC123  # Remove from view
atomic record src/fix.rs -m "Updated fix"  # New change: ABC124
# ABC123 still exists in change store, can be referenced

Q: Can two changes have the same hash by accident?

A: Astronomically unlikely. Blake3 has 256-bit output space (2^256 possible hashes). Collision probability is negligible.

Q: What if dependencies differ?

A: Different dependencies = different hash.

# Change A depends on X
atomic record -m "Feature" --deps X
# Hash: AAA111

# Change B depends on Y
atomic record -m "Feature" --deps Y
# Hash: BBB222 (different!)

# Even if hunks are identical, dependencies differ

Q: How does this affect performance?

A: Positively! Content-based hashing enables:

Automatic deduplication (saves space)
Faster conflict detection
Better caching strategies

Q: Can I see the raw hash?

A: Yes!

atomic show ABC123 --format json
# Output:
# {
#   "hash": "ABC123DEF456...",
#   "blake3": "f8e9a7b6c5d4e3f2a1b0...",
#   "hunks": [...],
#   "dependencies": [...]
# }

Advanced: Change Algebra

Change identity enables mathematical operations:

Commutative Property

A + B = B + A

Same changes in different order produce the same result.

Associative Property

(A + B) + C = A + (B + C)

Grouping doesn't matter.

Identity Element

A + ∅ = A

Empty change doesn't affect result.

Inverse Element

A + A⁻¹ = ∅

Change and its inverse cancel out.

Why this matters: These properties enable conflict-free merges and parallel development at scale.

Implementation Notes

Hash Algorithm

Atomic uses Blake3 for change hashing:

Fast (faster than SHA-2, competitive with SHA-1)
Secure (cryptographically strong)
Parallel (tree-based hashing)
Fixed output (256 bits)

Encoding

Hashes are encoded as base32 for human readability:

Case-insensitive
No ambiguous characters (0/O, 1/l)
URL-safe
Shorter than hex for same information

Summary

Change identity is what makes Atomic different:

✅ Changes identified by content only
✅ Same code = same hash everywhere
✅ No lost work from duplicate fixes
✅ References never break
✅ Automatic deduplication
✅ Mathematical correctness

This foundation enables Atomic's advanced features: commutative merges, view-based development, and AI agent collaboration at scale.

Key Takeaway: In Git, commits are snapshots in time. In Atomic, changes are timeless mathematical objects identified solely by their transformations.

Overview​

What is Change Identity?​

Git vs Atomic: A Critical Difference​

Git Commits​

Atomic Changes​

Why This Matters​

1. No Lost Work from Duplicate Fixes​

2. Change References Never Break​

3. Cross-Repository Deduplication​

How Change Hashing Works​

Step 1: Normalize Hunks​

Step 2: Hash Dependencies​

Step 3: Base32 Encoding​

Change Identity in Practice​

Same Change, Different Messages​

Same Change, Different Authors​

Same Change, Different Timestamps​

Change Metadata vs Identity​

Benefits of Content-Based Identity​

✅ Deduplication Across Repositories​

✅ Stable References​

✅ Provable Correctness​

✅ Cross-Team Collaboration​

Comparison Table​

Common Questions​

Q: What if I want to update a change?​

Q: Can two changes have the same hash by accident?​

Q: What if dependencies differ?​

Q: How does this affect performance?​

Q: Can I see the raw hash?​

Advanced: Change Algebra​

Commutative Property​

Associative Property​

Identity Element​

Inverse Element​

Implementation Notes​

Hash Algorithm​

Encoding​

See Also​

Summary​

Overview

What is Change Identity?

Git vs Atomic: A Critical Difference

Git Commits

Atomic Changes

Why This Matters

1. No Lost Work from Duplicate Fixes

2. Change References Never Break

3. Cross-Repository Deduplication

How Change Hashing Works

Step 1: Normalize Hunks

Step 2: Hash Dependencies

Step 3: Base32 Encoding

Change Identity in Practice

Same Change, Different Messages

Same Change, Different Authors

Same Change, Different Timestamps

Change Metadata vs Identity

Benefits of Content-Based Identity

✅ Deduplication Across Repositories

✅ Stable References

✅ Provable Correctness

✅ Cross-Team Collaboration

Comparison Table

Common Questions

Q: What if I want to update a change?

Q: Can two changes have the same hash by accident?

Q: What if dependencies differ?

Q: How does this affect performance?

Q: Can I see the raw hash?

Advanced: Change Algebra

Commutative Property

Associative Property

Identity Element

Inverse Element

Implementation Notes

Hash Algorithm

Encoding

See Also

Summary